Until he produces "legitimate" proof of his birth that shows he was lawfully (constitutionally) eligable to even run for President.
Thanks for the updated info Carey! The youtube video below was done extremely well and easy to understand. One of the best presentations I have seen yet.//////////
Please correct me if I am wrong but If I am correct and this is factual then we need to proceed immediately with the removal of Obama
FINALLY someone addressed the question I have posed and have been asking since Obama has taken office.
The question of whether Obama was born in Hawaii is but only one question, my question has been and still is and just as important, Since both of Obama's parents are not Americans does this disqualify him?
This is finally answered at the 9:40 mark of the link below and read the comments from Congressman Bingham.
Again, Please correct me if I am wrong but If this is factual then we need to proceed immediately with the removal of Obama and his cabinet and practice civil disobedience to what ever the Obama Administration has administered and is administering. This should also immediately call back all of the troops Obama has deployed.
John Bingham stated in the House of Representatives in 1862:
Who are natural-born citizens but those born in the Republic? […] [P]ersons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. (I highlited the sentence in red CKM)Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians.
He reiterated his statement in 1866:
Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.
BINGHAM, John Armor, a Representative from Ohio; born in Mercer, Mercer County, Pa., January 21, 1815; pursued academic studies; apprentice in a printing office for two years; attended Franklin College, Ohio; studied law; was admitted to the bar in 1840 and commenced practice in New Philadelphia, Tuscarawas County, Ohio; district attorney for Tuscarawas County, Ohio, 1846-1849; elected as an Opposition Party candidate to the Thirty-fourth Congress and as a Republican to the Thirty-fifth and Thirty-sixth Congresses (March 4, 1855-March 3, 1863); unsuccessful candidate for reelection in 1862 to the Thirty-eighth Congress; appointed by President Lincoln as judge advocate of the Union Army with the rank of major in 1864; later appointed solicitor of the court of claims; special judge advocate in the trial of the conspirators against the life of President Lincoln; elected to the Thirty-ninth and to the three succeeding Congresses (March 4, 1865-March 3, 1873); chairman, Committee on Claims (Fortieth Congress), Committee on the Judiciary (Forty-first and Forty-second Congresses); unsuccessful candidate for renomination in 1872; one of the managers appointed by the House of Representatives in 1862 to conduct the impeachment proceedings against West H. Humphreys, United States judge for the several districts of Tennessee, and in 1868 in the proceedings against Andrew Johnson; appointed Minister to Japan and served from May 31, 1873, until July 2, 1885; died in Cadiz, Harrison County, Ohio, March 19, 1900; interment in Cadiz Cemetery.
I'm with you Carey! I'm all for civil disobedience in this case! Obama has spent an obscene amount of money to keep his records private. Sorry, but when you run for public office everything about you becomes public....and should be! This is an act of a man trying to hide the truth. There is no doubt in my mind that he ran for and assumed the office of President fraudulently....a criminal act!
But I don't like that terminology "civil disobedience". This is a term that has been turned around on us.
Is it civil disobedience to follow the Constitution and not obey so called laws or directives that are unconstitutional? NO!
The Constitution is the SUPREME law of the land of which ALL elected servants in this country are required to obey....even the Supreme Court! FEW ARE DOING THAT! Why are Americans putting up with that?
I think it is patriotic to resist the kind of tyranny we are seeing in America today!
The term "civil disobedience" cannot be applied to people who are trying to protect and preserve their GOD given birth rights and freedoms! People have an absolute right to defend that.
That term is being applied to Patriots to villainize them and make them look bad.
It is Obama, his entire administration, most of Congress, and most State and local elected servants who are practicing "civil disobedience" by not following their Oath of office to protect our rights under the Conmstitution. It's worse than "civil disobedience". Most of these people are downright criminals who belong in jail! Slimeball Obama and his whole slimey administration belong in jail....and throw away the damned key!
The controls of our beloved country have been taken over by Marxists and Communists. They continually break the law but demand we follow it, demanding we listen to them and do what they say and obey unconstitutional laws they pass. They prey on the fact that we are law abiding citizens and will do what we are told. This will neutralize us and allow them to completely take over and change our country to something other than a FREE one. WE CANNOT LET THAT HAPPEN!
The time for what they call "civil disobedience" has been long overdue!